NISM V-A Chapter 10 carries 7 marks. Master Sharpe, Beta & Alpha metrics to interpret fund performance data. Learn how distributors compare funds and explain risk to clients.
Why Does NISM V-A Test Risk Metrics So Heavily?
Chapter 10 carries 7 marks and tests whether you can interpret fund performance data — not just define terms. These metrics are what you'll use daily as a distributor to compare funds and explain risk to clients. The exam tests both definitions and numerical interpretation.
What Is Standard Deviation and What Does It Measure?
Two funds with identical average returns but different standard deviations are not equivalent — the higher-SD fund is riskier. The exam often asks you to compare funds on this basis.
What Is the Sharpe Ratio and How Do You Calculate It?
What Is Beta and How Does It Differ from Standard Deviation?
Standard deviation measures total risk (systematic + unsystematic). Beta measures only systematic risk. For a well-diversified portfolio, most unsystematic risk is eliminated, making beta the relevant measure.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
Learn investing without the jargon
Plain-English guides on MFs, SIPs, and taxes — one email a week, free forever.
What Is Alpha and Why Does It Matter?
What Is the Difference Between CAGR and Absolute Return?
Absolute return measures total percentage gain from investment to redemption with no time adjustment. CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) annualises the return to enable comparison across different holding periods. For any holding period over 1 year, CAGR is the appropriate return metric.
Chapter 10 Practice Questions
Q1. Fund A: return 15%, risk-free rate 6%, standard deviation 9%. What is the Sharpe ratio?
Answer: 1.0. Sharpe = (15 – 6) ÷ 9 = 9 ÷ 9 = 1.0
Q2. A fund has beta of 1.5. If the market rises 10%, what is the expected fund return (ignoring alpha)?
Answer: 15%. Beta 1.5 × market return 10% = 15%. The fund amplifies market movements by 1.5x.
Q3. What does a negative alpha indicate about a fund?
Answer: The fund underperformed its benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis. The fund manager did not add value — the fund delivered less return than its level of systematic risk would predict.
Continue to Chapter 11: Scheme Performance or back to the full NISM V-A guide.